Tag: science communication

For years, the phrase “statistically significant” has been science’s gold stamp of approval. If your test came back with a p-value of less than 0.05, you were set. Publishable. “Proven.”. But over time, scientists, statisticians, and data scientists have begun to ask: Is this threshold propelling science forward, or backward? Along came Bayesian statistics — … Read More “Bayesian statistics: Why “p < 0.05" Might Be Misleading: The Beautiful Power of Bayesian Thinking” »